lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 21:07:12 +0200
From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
Cc: mic@...ikod.net, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yusongping@...wei.com,
	artem.kuzin@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add 11 new test suites
 dedicated to network

Hi!

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:13:37AM +0800, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> +TEST_F(inet, bind)

If you are using TEST_F() and you are enforcing a Landlock ruleset
within that test, doesn't that mean that the same Landlock ruleset is
now also enabled on other tests that get run after that test?

Most of the other Landlock selftests use TEST_F_FORK() for that
reason, so that the Landlock enforcement stays local to the specific
test, and does not accidentally influence the observed behaviour in
other tests.

The same question applies to other test functions in this file as
well.

–Günther

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ