[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<RO2P215MB19383189863E11A1B242E02BA729A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:13:38 -0500
From: Sardonimous <sardonimous@...mail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: After kernel 6.3.7 or 6.3.8 b43 driver fails
On 7/3/23 12:35 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
> Sorry that it took so long to get back to you.
>
> For my ppc32, there is no regression. It took a while to learn the
> pio=1 and qos=0 are BOTH needed. That I do not understand, but with
> both set, the device works with kernel 6.4 and all earlier kernels
> that I tried. Fortunately, I did not need to do the entire bisection.
>
> I am working on eliminating the warning that appears with qos=0, but
> it does not inhibit operations.
>
> @Bagas Sanjaya: Please mark this "regression" as invalid.
>
> Larry
>
I appreciate the time you've spent on this. I did try 6.4 again (6.4.1
actually) and wlan0 did eventually come active. When I tried this
before, I probably got freaked by the number of WARNINGs when it wasn't
connecting, but perhaps it was failing for some other reason. I didn't
realize they were only warnings.
$ uptime
15:10:52 up 9 min, 3 users, load average: 0.11, 0.92, 0.85
$ journalctl --boot | grep "WARNING.*__ieee80211_stop_queue+0xcc/0xe0"
| wc -l
111
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists