netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: keep ports without IFF_UNICAST_FLT in BR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:20:22 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
 idosch@...dia.com, mst@...hat.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
 bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: keep ports without IFF_UNICAST_FLT in
 BR_PROMISC mode

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:41:18 +0300 you wrote:
> According to the synchronization rules for .ndo_get_stats() as seen in
> Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst, acquiring a plain spin_lock()
> should not be illegal, but the bridge driver implementation makes it so.
> 
> After running these commands, I am being faced with the following
> lockdep splat:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: keep ports without IFF_UNICAST_FLT in BR_PROMISC mode
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/6ca3c005d060

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html