netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add 11 new test suites dedicated to network

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:37:13 +0300
From: "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
	Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
CC: <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <yusongping@...wei.com>,
	<artem.kuzin@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add 11 new test suites
 dedicated to network



7/2/2023 11:45 AM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
> 
> On 01/07/2023 21:07, Günther Noack wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:13:37AM +0800, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
>>> +TEST_F(inet, bind)
>> 
>> If you are using TEST_F() and you are enforcing a Landlock ruleset
>> within that test, doesn't that mean that the same Landlock ruleset is
>> now also enabled on other tests that get run after that test?
>> 
>> Most of the other Landlock selftests use TEST_F_FORK() for that
>> reason, so that the Landlock enforcement stays local to the specific
>> test, and does not accidentally influence the observed behaviour in
>> other tests.
> 
> Initially Konstantin wrote tests with TEST_F_FORK() but I asked him to
> only use TEST_F() because TEST_F_FORK() is only useful when a
> FIXTURE_TEARDOWN() needs access rights that were dropped with a
> TEST_F(), e.g. to unmount mount points set up with a FIXTURE_SETUP()
> while Landlock restricted a test process.
> 
> Indeed, TEST_F() already fork() to make sure there is no side effect
> with tests.
> 

  Hi, Günther
  Yep. Mickaёl asked me to replace TEST_F_FORK() with TEST_F(). Please 
check this thread
 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/33c1f049-12e4-f06d-54c9-b54eec779e6f@digikod.net/
T
>> 
>> The same question applies to other test functions in this file as
>> well.
>> 
>> –Günther
> .