[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+UBctC57Lx=8Eh6P51cVz+cyb02GE_B-dWnYhffWoc-nm7v6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:10:48 -0700
From: Yu Hao <yhao016@....edu>
To: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ethernet: e1000e: Fix possible uninit bug
The variable phy_data should be initialized in function e1e_rphy.
However, there is not return value check, which means there is a
possible uninit read later for the variable.
Signed-off-by: Yu Hao <yhao016@....edu>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 771a3c909c45..455af5e55cc6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -6910,8 +6910,11 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
/* report the system wakeup cause from S3/S4 */
if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_HAS_PHY_WAKEUP) {
u16 phy_data;
+ s32 ret_val;
- e1e_rphy(&adapter->hw, BM_WUS, &phy_data);
+ ret_val = e1e_rphy(&adapter->hw, BM_WUS, &phy_data);
+ if (ret_val)
+ return ret_val;
if (phy_data) {
e_info("PHY Wakeup cause - %s\n",
phy_data & E1000_WUS_EX ? "Unicast Packet" :
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists