netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] net: phy: at803x: support qca8081 1G chip type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66a5f898-e3fd-460a-b604-bb11a000e4e9@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 01:24:44 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] net: phy: at803x: support qca8081 1G chip type

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:00:15PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
> The qca8081 1G chip version does not support 2.5 capability, which
> is distinguished from qca8081 2.5G chip according to the bit0 of
> register mmd7.0x901d.
> 
> The fast retrain and master slave seed configs are only needed when
> the 2.5G capability is supported.
> 
> Switch to use genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities for .get_features API.

It is better to have lots of small patches, each doing one thing. If
something regresses, a git bisect gives a much finer idea where the
problem is. It is also easier to review small patches with good commit
messages.

So please break this patch up.

> -	/* Configure lower ramdom seed to make phy linked as slave mode */
> -	ret = qca808x_phy_ms_random_seed_set(phydev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		/* Configure lower ramdom seed to make phy linked as slave mode */
> +		ret = qca808x_phy_ms_random_seed_set(phydev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

Shouldn't this depend on how MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_AN_T1_ADV_L bit
MDIO_AN_T1_ADV_M_MST is set? Maybe the user wants it to prefer master
rather than slave?

I know you are just trying to move code around, but it does seem like
a good time to also improve the code.

FYI: net-next is closed at the moment. Officially you should post as
RFC, or wait until it opens again.

  Andrew