[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA85sZvZ_X=TqCXaPui0PDLq2pp5dw_uhga+wcXgBqudrLP9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:27:20 +0200
From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] bug with rx-udp-gro-forwarding offloading?
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 10:42 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 15:58 +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:29 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 13:32 +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 12:28 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:27 +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > > > More stacktraces.. =)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cat bug.txt | ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux
> > > > > > [ 411.413767] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > [ 411.413792] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 942 at include/net/ud p.h:509
> > > > > > udpv6_queue_rcv_skb (./include/net/udp.h:509 net/ipv6/udp.c:800
> > > > > > net/ipv6/udp.c:787)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm really running out of ideas here...
> > > > >
> > > > > This is:
> > > > >
> > > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(UDP_SKB_CB(skb)->partial_cov);
> > > > >
> > > > > sort of hint skb being shared (skb->users > 1) while enqueued in
> > > > > multiple places (bridge local input and br forward/flood to tun
> > > > > device). I audited the bridge mc flooding code, and I could not find
> > > > > how a shared skb could land into the local input path.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway the other splats reported here and in later emails are
> > > > > compatible with shared skbs.
> > > > >
> > > > > The above leads to another bunch of questions:
> > > > > * can you reproduce the issue after disabling 'rx-gro-list' on the
> > > > > ingress device? (while keeping 'rx-udp-gro-forwarding' on).
> > > >
> > > > With rx-gro-list off, as in never turned on, everything seems to run fine
> > > >
> > > > > * do you have by chance qdiscs on top of the VM tun devices?
> > > >
> > > > default qdisc is fq
> > >
> > > IIRC libvirt could reset the qdisc to noqueue for the owned tun
> > > devices.
> > >
> > > Could you please report the output of:
> > >
> > > tc -d -s qdisc show dev <tun dev name>
> >
> > I don't have these set:
> > CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS
> > CONFIG_NET_SCHED
> >
> > so tc just gives an error...
>
> The above is confusing. AS CONFIG_NET_SCH_DEFAULT depends on
> CONFIG_NET_SCHED, you should not have a default qdisc, too ;)
Well it's still set in sysctl - dunno if it fails
> Could you please share your kernel config?
Sure...
As a side note, it hasn't crashed - no traces since we did the last change
For reference, this is git diff on the running kernels source tree:
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index cea28d30abb5..1b2394ebaf33 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -4270,6 +4270,17 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_shared(skb))) {
+ skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!skb)
+ goto err_linearize;
+ }
+
+ /* later code will clear the gso area in the shared info */
+ err = skb_header_unclone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_linearize;
+
skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
while (list_skb) {
@@ -4328,6 +4339,9 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb->prev = tail;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb->next))
+ goto err_linearize;
+
if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
__skb_linearize(skb))
goto err_linearize;
---
> Thanks!
>
> /P
>
Download attachment "config-6.4.1" of type "application/x-troff-man" (128661 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists