[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MWHPR1801MB19180605C58796644F1501E4D32CA@MWHPR1801MB1918.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 03:18:55 +0000
From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sunil Kovvuri
Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep
Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
Srujana Challa <schalla@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-af: Promisc enable/disable through
mbox
> From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 7:04 PM
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-af: Promisc enable/disable through
> mbox
> Please follow the Patchwork report.
> There are several lines exceeding 80 characters.
I cloned https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git and ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --codespell --patch <patchname> is not showing these errors/warnings.
Could you please help in understanding why this restriction is removed in checkpatch.pl and kept in patchwork script ?.
Is it mandatory to fix these ? ASFAIK, 80 lines restriction is old one when screen size were small.
-Ratheesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists