netdev - [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/14] bpf: Allow reuse from waiting_for_gp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230706033447.54696-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Jul 2023 20:34:42 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	void@...ifault.com,
	houtao@...weicloud.com,
	paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: tj@...nel.org,
	rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/14] bpf: Allow reuse from waiting_for_gp_ttrace list.

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

alloc_bulk() can reuse elements from free_by_rcu_ttrace.
Let it reuse from waiting_for_gp_ttrace as well to avoid unnecessary kmalloc().

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 9986c6b7df4d..e5a87f6cf2cc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -212,6 +212,15 @@ static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node)
 	if (i >= cnt)
 		return;
 
+	for (; i < cnt; i++) {
+		obj = llist_del_first(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace);
+		if (!obj)
+			break;
+		add_obj_to_free_list(c, obj);
+	}
+	if (i >= cnt)
+		return;
+
 	memcg = get_memcg(c);
 	old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
 	for (; i < cnt; i++) {
@@ -295,12 +304,7 @@ static void do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!llist_empty(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace));
 	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu_ttrace))
-		/* There is no concurrent __llist_add(waiting_for_gp_ttrace) access.
-		 * It doesn't race with llist_del_all either.
-		 * But there could be two concurrent llist_del_all(waiting_for_gp_ttrace):
-		 * from __free_rcu() and from drain_mem_cache().
-		 */
-		__llist_add(llnode, &c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace);
+		llist_add(llnode, &c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace);
 
 	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(c->draining))) {
 		__free_rcu(&c->rcu_ttrace);
-- 
2.34.1