[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <997780a9-1cbc-46a2-2743-7fd493682278@foss.st.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:30:46 +0200
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
<olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com>, <lee@...nel.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <arnd@...nel.org>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] arm64: dts: st: add RIFSC as a domain controller
for STM32MP25x boards
Hi Alex,
On 7/6/23 11:25, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Gatien
>
> On 7/5/23 19:27, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> RIFSC is a firewall controller. Change its compatible so that is matches
>> the documentation and reference RIFSC as a feature-domain-controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> index 5268a4321841..62101084cab8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> @@ -106,17 +106,20 @@ soc@0 {
>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
>> rifsc: rifsc-bus@...80000 {
>> - compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + compatible = "st,stm32mp25-rifsc";
>
> You could keep "simple-bus" compatible (in second position). In case of
> the RIFSC is not probed, the platform will be able to boot. If you agree
> you can use the same for ETZPC.
>
> Cheers
> Alex
Sure, good point.
I'll change that in V2
Best regards,
Gatien
>
>> reg = <0x42080000 0x1000>;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> ranges;
>> + feature-domain-controller;
>> + #feature-domain-cells = <1>;
>> usart2: serial@...e0000 {
>> compatible = "st,stm32h7-uart";
>> reg = <0x400e0000 0x400>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 115 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> clocks = <&ck_flexgen_08>;
>> + feature-domains = <&rifsc 32>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists