[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:21:38 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, david@...es.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
zbr@...emap.net, brauner@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com, leon@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
socketcan@...tkopp.net, petrm@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 2:11 AM Anjali Kulkarni
<anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> To use filtering at the connector & cn_proc layers, we need to enable
> filtering in the netlink layer. This reverses the patch which removed
> netlink filtering.
>
" the patch which removed netlink filtering." is vague...
Convention is to name the reverted commit with sha1 ("title"),
to ease reviewer work ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists