netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/10] firewall: introduce stm32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:44:34 +0200
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
        <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
        <mchehab@...nel.org>, <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
        <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com>, <lee@...nel.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <arnd@...nel.org>,
        <richardcochran@...il.com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] firewall: introduce stm32_firewall framework



On 7/7/23 17:10, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 04:00:23PM +0200, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
>> I'll change to (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) :)
> 
> If you do that, I'll require a lawyer to sign off on it to verify that
> you all know EXACTLY the work involved in dealing with dual-licensed
> kernel code.  Sorry, licenses aren't jokes.

I was worried about the interactions with software running on BSD
license, hence my (poorly written) proposal. Looking back at it
there's no good reason to use a dual-license here.
GPL-2.0-only is fine.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h