[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230708065910.3565820-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 14:59:10 +0800
From: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<hannes@...essinduktion.org>, <fbl@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] ipv6/addrconf: fix a potential refcount underflow for idev
Now in addrconf_mod_rs_timer(), reference idev depends on whether
rs_timer is not pending. Then modify rs_timer timeout.
There is a time gap in [1], during which if the pending rs_timer
becomes not pending. It will miss to hold idev, but the rs_timer
is activated. Thus rs_timer callback function addrconf_rs_timer()
will be executed and put idev later without holding idev. A refcount
underflow issue for idev can be caused by this.
if (!timer_pending(&idev->rs_timer))
in6_dev_hold(idev);
<--------------[1]
mod_timer(&idev->rs_timer, jiffies + when);
To fix the issue, hold idev if mod_timer() return 0.
Fixes: b7b1bfce0bb6 ("ipv6: split duplicate address detection and router solicitation timer")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
---
v2:
- Do not hold idev anyway firstly.
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 5479da08ef40..e5213e598a04 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -318,9 +318,8 @@ static void addrconf_del_dad_work(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
static void addrconf_mod_rs_timer(struct inet6_dev *idev,
unsigned long when)
{
- if (!timer_pending(&idev->rs_timer))
+ if (!mod_timer(&idev->rs_timer, jiffies + when))
in6_dev_hold(idev);
- mod_timer(&idev->rs_timer, jiffies + when);
}
static void addrconf_mod_dad_work(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists