netdev - Re: [PATCH] Move rmnet out of NET_VENDOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230707162737.0a411b18@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:27:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Justin Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jacob Keller
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move rmnet out of NET_VENDOR_QUALCOMM dependency

On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:19:12 -0600 Justin Forbes wrote:
> they add an entry for it, and don't realize that the entry is ignored

Maybe that someone should not be "adding an entry" to a file which 
has this at the top:

#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.

?

> VENDOR_QUALCOMM is not enabled.  Either all devices capable of using
> rmnet should be hidden behind VENDOR_QUALCOMM or rmnet should not be.

I agree that Qualcomm drivers are an atrocious mess.
They should live neatly in the wwan section. But it's Qualcomm,
they don't care. Let's not have it sprawl even more.