netdev - Re: Fw: [Bug 217640] New: 10G SFP+ and 1G Ethernet work at 100M on macchiatobin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 23:23:03 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 217640] New: 10G SFP+ and 1G Ethernet work at 100M on
 macchiatobin

Adding Russell King.

       Andrew

On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 07:59:19AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 23:23:02 +0000
> From: bugzilla-daemon@...nel.org
> To: stephen@...workplumber.org
> Subject: [Bug 217640] New: 10G SFP+ and 1G Ethernet work at 100M on macchiatobin
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217640
> 
>             Bug ID: 217640
>            Summary: 10G SFP+ and 1G Ethernet work at 100M on macchiatobin
>            Product: Networking
>            Version: 2.5
>           Hardware: All
>                 OS: Linux
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P3
>          Component: Other
>           Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
>           Reporter: alpha_one_x86@...st-world.info
>         Regression: No
> 
> Hi,
> Since I upgrade linux kernel from 5.10.137 to 6.1.38 all my interface of
> macchiatobin work at 100M (90 Mbits/sec detected by iperf)
> ethtool detect the link at correct speed (10G for SFP+ and 1Gbps for ethernet)
> What can be the regression?
> 
> -- 
> You may reply to this email to add a comment.
> 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
>