[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a561aac-08c6-5a20-6254-82b2c2601d13@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:13:16 +0300
From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...e.de>
To: Yu Hao <yhao016@....edu>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: e1000e: Fix possible uninit bug
On 7/5/23 03:10, Yu Hao wrote:
> The variable phy_data should be initialized in function e1e_rphy.
> However, there is not return value check, which means there is a
> possible uninit read later for the variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Hao <yhao016@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 771a3c909c45..455af5e55cc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6910,8 +6910,11 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> /* report the system wakeup cause from S3/S4 */
> if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_HAS_PHY_WAKEUP) {
> u16 phy_data;
> + s32 ret_val;
>
> - e1e_rphy(&adapter->hw, BM_WUS, &phy_data);
> + ret_val = e1e_rphy(&adapter->hw, BM_WUS, &phy_data);
> + if (ret_val)
> + return ret_val;
> if (phy_data) {
> e_info("PHY Wakeup cause - %s\n",
> phy_data & E1000_WUS_EX ? "Unicast Packet" :
the same case appears in other places in the driver like e1000_setup_rctl()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists