netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next][resend v1 1/1] netlink: Don't use int as bool in netlink_update_socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a2d55f167a06782eb9dfa6988ec96c2eedb7fba.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 12:21:12 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko
	 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
	Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next][resend v1 1/1] netlink: Don't use int as bool
 in netlink_update_socket_mc()

On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 09:33 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 01:06:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The bit operations take boolean parameter and return also boolean
> > (in test_bit()-like cases). Don't threat booleans as integers when
> > it's not needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > index 383631873748..d81e7a43944c 100644
> > --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > @@ -1623,9 +1623,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_set_err);
> >  /* must be called with netlink table grabbed */
> >  static void netlink_update_socket_mc(struct netlink_sock *nlk,
> >  				     unsigned int group,
> > -				     int is_new)
> > +				     bool new)
> >  {
> > -	int old, new = !!is_new, subscriptions;
> > +	int subscriptions;
> > +	bool old;
> >  
> >  	old = test_bit(group - 1, nlk->groups);
> >  	subscriptions = nlk->subscriptions - old + new;
> 
> So what is the outcome of "int - bool + bool" in the line above?

FTR, I agree with Leon, the old code is more readable to me/I don't see
a practical gain with this change.

Cheers,

Paolo