[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <774e2719376723595425067ab3a6f59b72c50bc2.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 12:10:28 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] eth: bnxt: handle invalid Tx completions
more gracefully
On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 13:56 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Invalid Tx completions should never happen (tm) but when they do
> they crash the host, because driver blindly trusts that there is
> a valid skb pointer on the ring.
>
> The completions I've seen appear to be some form of FW / HW
> miscalculation or staleness, they have typical (small) values
> (<100), but they are most often higher than number of queued
> descriptors. They usually happen after boot.
>
> Instead of crashing print a warning and schedule a reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index b8ddad33b01a..bfa56f35d2e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -690,6 +690,16 @@ static void bnxt_tx_int(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi, int nr_pkts)
> skb = tx_buf->skb;
> tx_buf->skb = NULL;
>
> + if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> + netdev_err(bp->dev, "Invalid Tx completion (ring:%d tx_pkts:%d cons:%u prod:%u i:%d)",
> + txr->txq_index, bnapi->tx_pkts,
> + txr->tx_cons, txr->tx_prod, i);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + bnapi->tx_fault = 1;
> + bnxt_queue_sp_work(bp, BNXT_RESET_TASK_SP_EVENT);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> tx_bytes += skb->len;
>
> if (tx_buf->is_push) {
> @@ -2576,7 +2586,7 @@ static int __bnxt_poll_work(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
>
> static void __bnxt_poll_work_done(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi)
> {
> - if (bnapi->tx_pkts) {
> + if (bnapi->tx_pkts && !bnapi->tx_fault) {
> bnapi->tx_int(bp, bnapi, bnapi->tx_pkts);
> bnapi->tx_pkts = 0;
> }
> @@ -9429,6 +9439,8 @@ static void bnxt_enable_napi(struct bnxt *bp)
> struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = bp->bnapi[i];
> struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr;
>
> + bnapi->tx_fault = 0;
> +
> cpr = &bnapi->cp_ring;
> if (bnapi->in_reset)
> cpr->sw_stats.rx.rx_resets++;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> index 080e73496066..08ce9046bfd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,7 @@ struct bnxt_napi {
> int);
> int tx_pkts;
> u8 events;
> + u8 tx_fault:1;
Since there are still a few holes avail, I would use a plain u8 (or
bool) to help the compiler emit better code.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists