[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVCQmh6V182q4g---jvsWiTOP2hBPZKvma6oUN6535LEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:55:26 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...a.com,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND messages (was: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7]
workqueue: Report work funcs that trigger automatic CPU_INTENSIVE mechanism)
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 9:54 PM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Workqueue now automatically marks per-cpu work items that hog CPU for too
> long as CPU_INTENSIVE, which excludes them from concurrency management and
> prevents stalling other concurrency-managed work items. If a work function
> keeps running over the thershold, it likely needs to be switched to use an
> unbound workqueue.
>
> This patch adds a debug mechanism which tracks the work functions which
> trigger the automatic CPU_INTENSIVE mechanism and report them using
> pr_warn() with exponential backoff.
>
> v2: Drop bouncing through kthread_worker for printing messages. It was to
> avoid introducing circular locking dependency but wasn't effective as it
> still had pool lock -> wci_lock -> printk -> pool lock loop. Let's just
> print directly using printk_deferred().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 6363845005202148
("workqueue: Report work funcs that trigger automatic CPU_INTENSIVE
mechanism") in v6.5-rc1.
I guess you are interested to know where this triggers.
I enabled CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT=y, and tested
the result on various machines...
SH/R-Mobile:
workqueue: genpd_power_off_work_fn hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times,
consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
Atmark Techno Armadillo800-EVA with shmob_drm:
workqueue: drm_fb_helper_damage_work hogged CPU for >10000us 16
times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
R-Car Gen2:
workqueue: rtc_timer_do_work hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times,
consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
R-Car Gen2/Gen3:
workqueue: pm_runtime_work hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider
switching to WQ_UNBOUND
R-Car Gen3:
workqueue: kfree_rcu_work hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider
switching to WQ_UNBOUND
OrangeCrab/Linux-on-LiteX-VexRiscV with ht16k33 14-seg display and ssd130xdrmfb:
workqueue: check_lifetime hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider
switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: drm_fb_helper_damage_work hogged CPU for >10000us 1024
times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: fb_flashcursor hogged CPU for >10000us 128 times,
consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: ht16k33_seg14_update hogged CPU for >10000us 128 times,
consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: mmc_rescan hogged CPU for >10000us 128 times, consider
switching to WQ_UNBOUND
Atari (ARAnyM):
workqueue: ata_sff_pio_task hogged CPU for >10000us 64 times,
consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
The OrangeCrab is a slow machine, so it's not that surprising to see these
messages...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists