lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:40:20 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
 xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
 petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: flower: Ensure both minimum and maximum ports
 are specified

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:08:09 +0300 you wrote:
> The kernel does not currently validate that both the minimum and maximum
> ports of a port range are specified. This can lead user space to think
> that a filter matching on a port range was successfully added, when in
> fact it was not. For example, with a patched (buggy) iproute2 that only
> sends the minimum port, the following commands do not return an error:
> 
>  # tc filter add dev swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip flower ip_proto udp src_port 100-200 action pass
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net/sched: flower: Ensure both minimum and maximum ports are specified
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d3f87278bcb8

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ