netdev - Re: Regression: supported_interfaces filling enforcement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 02:58:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Sergei Antonov <saproj@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Regression: supported_interfaces filling enforcement

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:58:48AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:09:48PM +0300, Sergei Antonov wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 18:38, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > That being said, given the kind of bugs I've seen uncovered in this
> > > driver recently, I'd say it would be ridiculous to play pretend - you're
> > > probably one of its only users. You can probably be a bit aggressive,
> > > remove support for incomplete device trees, see if anyone complains, and
> > > they do, revert the removal.
> > 
> > Can mv88e6060 functionality be transferred to mv88e6xxx?
> 
> Honestly, I don't know.

I think Vivien looked at that once, but decided against it. I don't
remember why. Maybe because of lack of hardware, or anybody to test
it?

	Andrew