[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLimyipgG41BoGb52HAFbxRdmU2HwfNw-GZr6WZ0c1v2LqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:50:16 -0700
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] eth: bnxt: handle invalid Tx completions
more gracefully
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:24 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> Are you saying that in ethtool -S in addition to per-ring counts
> we'd report a "total" which is sum(current per ring) + saved?
> If so - that makes sense, yup.
Yes, for example, we have "rx_resets" which is per ring. We'll add a
"rx_total_resets" which is the sum of all current "rx_resets" + the
saved snapshot. The per ring "rx_resets" will reset to 0 during each
reset (including ifdown). But "rx_total_resets" will be saved across
reset.
> You mention reset but the errors counters should survive close() /
> open() cycles as well.
Yes. It's the same reset whether it is ifdown/ifup or reset.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4209 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists