[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZK+2aWTsWIKnJ9FX@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:31:37 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org,
shaozhengchao@...wei.com, victor@...atatu.com,
paolo.valente@...more.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/4] net/sched: sch_qfq: reintroduce lmax bound
check for MTU
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 06:01:00PM -0300, Pedro Tammela wrote:
> 25369891fcef deletes a check for the case where no 'lmax' is
> specified which 3037933448f6 previously fixed as 'lmax'
> could be set to the device's MTU without any bound checking
> for QFQ_LMAX_MIN and QFQ_LMAX_MAX. Therefore, reintroduce the check.
>
> Fixes: 25369891fcef ("net/sched: sch_qfq: refactor parsing of netlink parameters")
> Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists