[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230713104717.29475-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:47:13 +0200
From: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>
To:
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@....tech>
Subject: [PATCH iwl-next v3 0/4] igb: Add support for AF_XDP zero-copy
The first couple of patches adds helper funcctions to prepare for AF_XDP
zero-copy support which comes in the last couple of patches, one each
for Rx and TX paths.
As mentioned in v1 patchset [0], I don't have access to an actual IGB
device to provide correct performance numbers. I have used Intel 82576EB
emulator in QEMU [1] to test the changes to IGB driver.
The tests use one isolated vCPU for RX/TX and one isolated vCPU for the
xdp-sock application [2]. Hope these measurements provide at the least
some indication on the increase in performance when using ZC, especially
in the TX path. It would be awesome if someone with a real IGB NIC can
test the patch.
AF_XDP performance using 64 byte packets in Kpps.
Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-DRV XDP-DRV(ZC)
rxdrop 220 235 350
txpush 1.000 1.000 410
l2fwd 1.000 1.000 200
AF_XDP performance using 1500 byte packets in Kpps.
Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-DRV XDP-DRV(ZC)
rxdrop 200 210 310
txpush 1.000 1.000 410
l2fwd 0.900 1.000 160
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20230704095915.9750-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech/
[1]: https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/system/devices/igb.html
[2]: https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/master/AF_XDP-example
v2->v3:
- Avoid TX unit hang when using AF_XDP zero-copy by setting time_stamp
on the tx_buffer_info
- Fix uninitialized nb_buffs (Simon Horman)
v1->v2:
- Use batch XSK APIs (Maciej Fijalkowski)
- Follow reverse xmas tree convention and remove the ternary operator
use (Simon Horman)
Sriram Yagnaraman (4):
igb: prepare for AF_XDP zero-copy support
igb: Introduce XSK data structures and helpers
igb: add AF_XDP zero-copy Rx support
igb: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 35 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 181 ++++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 522 ++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 694 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists