[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230713095116.15760660@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:51:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Dinh Nguyen
<dinguyen@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowskii+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: dwmac_socfpga: use the standard "ahb" reset
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:39:57 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > However for ABI breaks with scope limited to only one given platform, it
> > is the platform's maintainer choice to allow or not allow ABI breaks.
> > What we, Devicetree maintainers expect, is to mention and provide
> > rationale for the ABI break in the commit msg.
>
> @Dinh: you should at least update the commit message to provide such
> rationale, or possibly even better, drop this 2nd patch on next
> submission.
Or support both bindings, because the reset looks optional. So maybe
instead of deleting the use of "stmmaceth-ocp", only go down that path
if stpriv->plat->stmmac_ahb_rst is NULL?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists