| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1689220976.8908284-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:02:56 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v11 06/10] virtio_ring: skip unmap for premapped
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:50:57 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:42 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > Now we add a case where we skip dma unmap, the vq->premapped is true.
> >
> > We can't just rely on use_dma_api to determine whether to skip the dma
> > operation. For convenience, I introduced the "do_unmap". By default, it
> > is the same as use_dma_api. If the driver is configured with premapped,
> > then do_unmap is false.
> >
> > So as long as do_unmap is false, for addr of desc, we should skip dma
> > unmap operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 1fb2c6dca9ea..10ee3b7ce571 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ struct vring_virtqueue {
> > /* Do DMA mapping by driver */
> > bool premapped;
> >
> > + /* Do unmap or not for desc. Just when premapped is False and
> > + * use_dma_api is true, this is true.
> > + */
> > + bool do_unmap;
> > +
> > /* Head of free buffer list. */
> > unsigned int free_head;
> > /* Number we've added since last sync. */
> > @@ -440,7 +445,7 @@ static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > {
> > u16 flags;
> >
> > - if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > + if (!vq->do_unmap)
> > return;
> >
> > flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->flags);
> > @@ -458,18 +463,21 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > struct vring_desc_extra *extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
> > u16 flags;
> >
> > - if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > flags = extra[i].flags;
> >
> > if (flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> > + if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > dma_unmap_single(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > extra[i].addr,
> > extra[i].len,
> > (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> > DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > } else {
> > + if (!vq->do_unmap)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > extra[i].addr,
> > extra[i].len,
> > @@ -635,7 +643,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > }
> > /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> > desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > - if (!indirect && vq->use_dma_api)
> > + if (!indirect && vq->do_unmap)
> > vq->split.desc_extra[prev & (vq->split.vring.num - 1)].flags &=
> > ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> >
> > @@ -794,7 +802,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> > VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT));
> > BUG_ON(len == 0 || len % sizeof(struct vring_desc));
> >
> > - if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > + if (vq->do_unmap) {
> > for (j = 0; j < len / sizeof(struct vring_desc); j++)
> > vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &indir_desc[j]);
> > }
> > @@ -1217,17 +1225,20 @@ static void vring_unmap_extra_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > {
> > u16 flags;
> >
> > - if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > - return;
> > -
> > flags = extra->flags;
> >
> > if (flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> > + if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > + return;
> > +
> > dma_unmap_single(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > extra->addr, extra->len,
> > (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> > DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > } else {
> > + if (!vq->do_unmap)
> > + return;
>
> This seems not straightforward than:
>
> if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> return;
>
> if (INDIRECT) {
> } else if (!vq->premapped) {
> }
>
> ?
My logic here is that for the real buffer, we use do_unmap to judge uniformly.
And indirect still use use_dma_api to judge.
>From this point of view, how do you feel?
Thanks.
>
> Thanks
>
> > +
> > dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > extra->addr, extra->len,
> > (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> > @@ -1240,7 +1251,7 @@ static void vring_unmap_desc_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > {
> > u16 flags;
> >
> > - if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> > + if (!vq->do_unmap)
> > return;
> >
> > flags = le16_to_cpu(desc->flags);
> > @@ -1329,7 +1340,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> > vq->packed.vring.desc[head].id = cpu_to_le16(id);
> >
> > - if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > + if (vq->do_unmap) {
> > vq->packed.desc_extra[id].addr = addr;
> > vq->packed.desc_extra[id].len = total_sg *
> > sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > @@ -1470,7 +1481,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > desc[i].len = cpu_to_le32(sg->length);
> > desc[i].id = cpu_to_le16(id);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(vq->use_dma_api)) {
> > + if (unlikely(vq->do_unmap)) {
> > vq->packed.desc_extra[curr].addr = addr;
> > vq->packed.desc_extra[curr].len = sg->length;
> > vq->packed.desc_extra[curr].flags =
> > @@ -1604,7 +1615,7 @@ static void detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > vq->free_head = id;
> > vq->vq.num_free += state->num;
> >
> > - if (unlikely(vq->use_dma_api)) {
> > + if (unlikely(vq->do_unmap)) {
> > curr = id;
> > for (i = 0; i < state->num; i++) {
> > vring_unmap_extra_packed(vq,
> > @@ -1621,7 +1632,7 @@ static void detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > if (!desc)
> > return;
> >
> > - if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > + if (vq->do_unmap) {
> > len = vq->packed.desc_extra[id].len;
> > for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > i++)
> > @@ -2080,6 +2091,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > vq->dma_dev = dma_dev;
> > vq->use_dma_api = vring_use_dma_api(vdev);
> > vq->premapped = false;
> > + vq->do_unmap = vq->use_dma_api;
> >
> > vq->indirect = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) &&
> > !context;
> > @@ -2587,6 +2599,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > vq->dma_dev = dma_dev;
> > vq->use_dma_api = vring_use_dma_api(vdev);
> > vq->premapped = false;
> > + vq->do_unmap = vq->use_dma_api;
> >
> > vq->indirect = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) &&
> > !context;
> > @@ -2765,6 +2778,7 @@ int virtqueue_set_premapped(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > vq->premapped = true;
> > + vq->do_unmap = false;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists