lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACLnSDiMD+BH_BBHQUAhSvfqe6jhnm4MOB2N_hog4VMhvdTYVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:33:59 +0300
From: Vitaly Grinberg <vgrinber@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, andy.ren@...cruise.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, 
	"Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, arnd@...db.de, axboe@...nel.dk, 
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, claudiajkang@...il.com, corbet@....net, 
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, geert+renesas@...der.be, 
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hkallweit1@...il.com, idosch@...dia.com, 
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, 
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com, leon@...nel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux@...y.sk, liuhangbin@...il.com, 
	lucien.xin@...il.com, masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.michalik@...el.com, 
	milena.olech@...el.com, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, 
	Michael Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, 
	nipun.gupta@....com, ogabbay@...nel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, phil@....cc, 
	Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>, razor@...ckwall.org, ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, 
	richardcochran@...il.com, saeedm@...dia.com, sj@...nel.org, 
	tzimmermann@...e.de, vadfed@...com, vadfed@...a.com, 
	vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

Hi,
I'd like to clarify about the DPLL phase offset requirement. We can
live without it during the initial submission. The addition of phase
offset can be an increment to patch v10.
Thanks,
Vitaly


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ