| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230714141545.26904-2-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:15:38 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: ast@...nel.org
Cc: andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
razor@...ckwall.org,
sdf@...gle.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
dxu@...uu.xyz,
joe@...ium.io,
toke@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] bpf: Add generic attach/detach/query API for multi-progs
This adds a generic layer called bpf_mprog which can be reused by different
attachment layers to enable multi-program attachment and dependency resolution.
In-kernel users of the bpf_mprog don't need to care about the dependency
resolution internals, they can just consume it with few API calls.
The initial idea of having a generic API sparked out of discussion [0] from an
earlier revision of this work where tc's priority was reused and exposed via
BPF uapi as a way to coordinate dependencies among tc BPF programs, similar
as-is for classic tc BPF. The feedback was that priority provides a bad user
experience and is hard to use [1], e.g.:
I cannot help but feel that priority logic copy-paste from old tc, netfilter
and friends is done because "that's how things were done in the past". [...]
Priority gets exposed everywhere in uapi all the way to bpftool when it's
right there for users to understand. And that's the main problem with it.
The user don't want to and don't need to be aware of it, but uapi forces them
to pick the priority. [...] Your cover letter [0] example proves that in
real life different service pick the same priority. They simply don't know
any better. Priority is an unnecessary magic that apps _have_ to pick, so
they just copy-paste and everyone ends up using the same.
The course of the discussion showed more and more the need for a generic,
reusable API where the "same look and feel" can be applied for various other
program types beyond just tc BPF, for example XDP today does not have multi-
program support in kernel, but also there was interest around this API for
improving management of cgroup program types. Such common multi-program
management concept is useful for BPF management daemons or user space BPF
applications coordinating internally about their attachments.
Both from Cilium and Meta side [2], we've collected the following requirements
for a generic attach/detach/query API for multi-progs which has been implemented
as part of this work:
- Support prog-based attach/detach and link API
- Dependency directives (can also be combined):
- BPF_F_{BEFORE,AFTER} with relative_{fd,id} which can be {prog,link,none}
- BPF_F_ID flag as {fd,id} toggle; the rationale for id is so that user
space application does not need CAP_SYS_ADMIN to retrieve foreign fds
via bpf_*_get_fd_by_id()
- BPF_F_LINK flag as {prog,link} toggle
- If relative_{fd,id} is none, then BPF_F_BEFORE will just prepend, and
BPF_F_AFTER will just append for attaching
- Enforced only at attach time
- BPF_F_REPLACE with replace_bpf_fd which can be prog, links have their
own infra for replacing their internal prog
- If no flags are set, then it's default append behavior for attaching
- Internal revision counter and optionally being able to pass expected_revision
- User space application can query current state with revision, and pass it
along for attachment to assert current state before doing updates
- Query also gets extension for link_ids array and link_attach_flags:
- prog_ids are always filled with program IDs
- link_ids are filled with link IDs when link was used, otherwise 0
- {prog,link}_attach_flags for holding {prog,link}-specific flags
- Must be easy to integrate/reuse for in-kernel users
The uapi-side changes needed for supporting bpf_mprog are rather minimal,
consisting of the additions of the attachment flags, revision counter, and
expanding existing union with relative_{fd,id} member.
The bpf_mprog framework consists of an bpf_mprog_entry object which holds
an array of bpf_mprog_fp (fast-path structure). The bpf_mprog_cp (control-path
structure) is part of bpf_mprog_bundle. Both have been separated, so that
fast-path gets efficient packing of bpf_prog pointers for maximum cache
efficiency. Also, array has been chosen instead of linked list or other
structures to remove unnecessary indirections for a fast point-to-entry in
tc for BPF.
The bpf_mprog_entry comes as a pair via bpf_mprog_bundle so that in case of
updates the peer bpf_mprog_entry is populated and then just swapped which
avoids additional allocations that could otherwise fail, for example, in
detach case. bpf_mprog_{fp,cp} arrays are currently static, but they could
be converted to dynamic allocation if necessary at a point in future.
Locking is deferred to the in-kernel user of bpf_mprog, for example, in case
of tcx which uses this API in the next patch, it piggybacks on rtnl.
An extensive test suite for checking all aspects of this API for prog-based
attach/detach and link API comes as BPF selftests in this series.
Thanks also to Andrii Nakryiko for early API discussions wrt Meta's BPF prog
management.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221004231143.19190-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+gEY3FjCR=+DmjDR4gp5bOYZUFJQXj4agKFHT9CQPZBw@mail.gmail.com
[2] http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2023_material/tcx_meta_netdev_borkmann.pdf
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
include/linux/bpf_mprog.h | 318 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 36 ++-
kernel/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/mprog.c | 439 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 36 ++-
6 files changed, 815 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_mprog.h
create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/mprog.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d1fc5d26c699..4f3b8139c6ff 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3684,6 +3684,7 @@ F: include/linux/filter.h
F: include/linux/tnum.h
F: kernel/bpf/core.c
F: kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c
+F: kernel/bpf/mprog.c
F: kernel/bpf/syscall.c
F: kernel/bpf/tnum.c
F: kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_mprog.h b/include/linux/bpf_mprog.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6feefec43422
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_mprog.h
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Isovalent */
+#ifndef __BPF_MPROG_H
+#define __BPF_MPROG_H
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+
+/* bpf_mprog framework:
+ *
+ * bpf_mprog is a generic layer for multi-program attachment. In-kernel users
+ * of the bpf_mprog don't need to care about the dependency resolution
+ * internals, they can just consume it with few API calls. Currently available
+ * dependency directives are BPF_F_{BEFORE,AFTER} which enable insertion of
+ * a BPF program or BPF link relative to an existing BPF program or BPF link
+ * inside the multi-program array as well as prepend and append behavior if
+ * no relative object was specified, see corresponding selftests for concrete
+ * examples (e.g. tc_links and tc_opts test cases of test_progs).
+ *
+ * Usage of bpf_mprog_{attach,detach,query}() core APIs with pseudo code:
+ *
+ * Attach case:
+ *
+ * struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry, *entry_new;
+ * int ret;
+ *
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side lock
+ * // fetch active @entry from attach location
+ * [...]
+ * ret = bpf_mprog_attach(entry, &entry_new, [...]);
+ * if (!ret) {
+ * if (entry != entry_new) {
+ * // swap @entry to @entry_new at attach location
+ * // ensure there are no inflight users of @entry:
+ * synchronize_rcu();
+ * }
+ * bpf_mprog_commit(entry);
+ * } else {
+ * // error path, bail out, propagate @ret
+ * }
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side unlock
+ *
+ * Detach case:
+ *
+ * struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry, *entry_new;
+ * int ret;
+ *
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side lock
+ * // fetch active @entry from attach location
+ * [...]
+ * ret = bpf_mprog_detach(entry, &entry_new, [...]);
+ * if (!ret) {
+ * // all (*) marked is optional and depends on the use-case
+ * // whether bpf_mprog_bundle should be freed or not
+ * if (!bpf_mprog_total(entry_new)) (*)
+ * entry_new = NULL (*)
+ * // swap @entry to @entry_new at attach location
+ * // ensure there are no inflight users of @entry:
+ * synchronize_rcu();
+ * bpf_mprog_commit(entry);
+ * if (!entry_new) (*)
+ * // free bpf_mprog_bundle (*)
+ * } else {
+ * // error path, bail out, propagate @ret
+ * }
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side unlock
+ *
+ * Query case:
+ *
+ * struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry;
+ * int ret;
+ *
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side lock
+ * // fetch active @entry from attach location
+ * [...]
+ * ret = bpf_mprog_query(attr, uattr, entry);
+ * // bpf_mprog user-side unlock
+ *
+ * Data/fast path:
+ *
+ * struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry;
+ * struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ * struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ * int ret = [...];
+ *
+ * rcu_read_lock();
+ * // fetch active @entry from attach location
+ * [...]
+ * bpf_mprog_foreach_prog(entry, fp, prog) {
+ * ret = bpf_prog_run(prog, [...]);
+ * // process @ret from program
+ * }
+ * [...]
+ * rcu_read_unlock();
+ *
+ * bpf_mprog locking considerations:
+ *
+ * bpf_mprog_{attach,detach,query}() must be protected by an external lock
+ * (like RTNL in case of tcx).
+ *
+ * bpf_mprog_entry pointer can be an __rcu annotated pointer (in case of tcx
+ * the netdevice has tcx_ingress and tcx_egress __rcu pointer) which gets
+ * updated via rcu_assign_pointer() pointing to the active bpf_mprog_entry of
+ * the bpf_mprog_bundle.
+ *
+ * Fast path accesses the active bpf_mprog_entry within RCU critical section
+ * (in case of tcx it runs in NAPI which provides RCU protection there,
+ * other users might need explicit rcu_read_lock()). The bpf_mprog_commit()
+ * assumes that for the old bpf_mprog_entry there are no inflight users
+ * anymore.
+ *
+ * The READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairing for bpf_mprog_fp's prog access is for
+ * the replacement case where we don't swap the bpf_mprog_entry.
+ */
+
+#define bpf_mprog_foreach_tuple(entry, fp, cp, t) \
+ for (fp = &entry->fp_items[0], cp = &entry->parent->cp_items[0];\
+ ({ \
+ t.prog = READ_ONCE(fp->prog); \
+ t.link = cp->link; \
+ t.prog; \
+ }); \
+ fp++, cp++)
+
+#define bpf_mprog_foreach_prog(entry, fp, p) \
+ for (fp = &entry->fp_items[0]; \
+ (p = READ_ONCE(fp->prog)); \
+ fp++)
+
+#define BPF_MPROG_MAX 64
+
+struct bpf_mprog_fp {
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+};
+
+struct bpf_mprog_cp {
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+};
+
+struct bpf_mprog_entry {
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp fp_items[BPF_MPROG_MAX];
+ struct bpf_mprog_bundle *parent;
+};
+
+struct bpf_mprog_bundle {
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry a;
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry b;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp cp_items[BPF_MPROG_MAX];
+ struct bpf_prog *ref;
+ atomic64_t revision;
+ u32 count;
+};
+
+struct bpf_tuple {
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+};
+
+static inline struct bpf_mprog_entry *
+bpf_mprog_peer(const struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ if (entry == &entry->parent->a)
+ return &entry->parent->b;
+ else
+ return &entry->parent->a;
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_bundle_init(struct bpf_mprog_bundle *bundle)
+{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(bundle->a.fp_items[0]) > sizeof(u64));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(bundle->a.fp_items) !=
+ ARRAY_SIZE(bundle->cp_items));
+
+ memset(bundle, 0, sizeof(*bundle));
+ atomic64_set(&bundle->revision, 1);
+ bundle->a.parent = bundle;
+ bundle->b.parent = bundle;
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_inc(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ entry->parent->count++;
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_dec(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ entry->parent->count--;
+}
+
+static inline int bpf_mprog_max(void)
+{
+ return ARRAY_SIZE(((struct bpf_mprog_entry *)NULL)->fp_items) - 1;
+}
+
+static inline int bpf_mprog_total(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ int total = entry->parent->count;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(total > bpf_mprog_max());
+ return total;
+}
+
+static inline bool bpf_mprog_exists(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ const struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ const struct bpf_prog *tmp;
+
+ bpf_mprog_foreach_prog(entry, fp, tmp) {
+ if (tmp == prog)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_mark_for_release(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(entry->parent->ref);
+ if (!tuple->link)
+ entry->parent->ref = tuple->prog;
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_complete_release(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ /* In the non-link case prog deletions can only drop the reference
+ * to the prog after the bpf_mprog_entry got swapped and the
+ * bpf_mprog ensured that there are no inflight users anymore.
+ *
+ * Paired with bpf_mprog_mark_for_release().
+ */
+ if (entry->parent->ref) {
+ bpf_prog_put(entry->parent->ref);
+ entry->parent->ref = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_revision_new(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ atomic64_inc(&entry->parent->revision);
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_commit(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ bpf_mprog_complete_release(entry);
+ bpf_mprog_revision_new(entry);
+}
+
+static inline u64 bpf_mprog_revision(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ return atomic64_read(&entry->parent->revision);
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_entry_copy(struct bpf_mprog_entry *dst,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry *src)
+{
+ memcpy(dst->fp_items, src->fp_items, sizeof(src->fp_items));
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_entry_grow(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry, int idx)
+{
+ int total = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+
+ memmove(entry->fp_items + idx + 1,
+ entry->fp_items + idx,
+ (total - idx) * sizeof(struct bpf_mprog_fp));
+
+ memmove(entry->parent->cp_items + idx + 1,
+ entry->parent->cp_items + idx,
+ (total - idx) * sizeof(struct bpf_mprog_cp));
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_entry_shrink(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry, int idx)
+{
+ /* Total array size is needed in this case to enure the NULL
+ * entry is copied at the end.
+ */
+ int total = ARRAY_SIZE(entry->fp_items);
+
+ memmove(entry->fp_items + idx,
+ entry->fp_items + idx + 1,
+ (total - idx - 1) * sizeof(struct bpf_mprog_fp));
+
+ memmove(entry->parent->cp_items + idx,
+ entry->parent->cp_items + idx + 1,
+ (total - idx - 1) * sizeof(struct bpf_mprog_cp));
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_read(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry, u32 idx,
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp **fp,
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp **cp)
+{
+ *fp = &entry->fp_items[idx];
+ *cp = &entry->parent->cp_items[idx];
+}
+
+static inline void bpf_mprog_write(struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp,
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(fp->prog, tuple->prog);
+ cp->link = tuple->link;
+}
+
+int bpf_mprog_attach(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog_new, struct bpf_link *link,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog_old,
+ u32 flags, u32 id_or_fd, u64 revision);
+
+int bpf_mprog_detach(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_link *link,
+ u32 flags, u32 id_or_fd, u64 revision);
+
+int bpf_mprog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry);
+
+#endif /* __BPF_MPROG_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 600d0caebbd8..1c166870cdf3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1113,7 +1113,12 @@ enum bpf_perf_event_type {
*/
#define BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE (1U << 0)
#define BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI (1U << 1)
+/* Generic attachment flags. */
#define BPF_F_REPLACE (1U << 2)
+#define BPF_F_BEFORE (1U << 3)
+#define BPF_F_AFTER (1U << 4)
+#define BPF_F_ID (1U << 5)
+#define BPF_F_LINK BPF_F_LINK /* 1 << 13 */
/* If BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the
* verifier will perform strict alignment checking as if the kernel
@@ -1444,14 +1449,19 @@ union bpf_attr {
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_ATTACH/DETACH commands */
- __u32 target_fd; /* container object to attach to */
- __u32 attach_bpf_fd; /* eBPF program to attach */
+ union {
+ __u32 target_fd; /* target object to attach to or ... */
+ __u32 target_ifindex; /* target ifindex */
+ };
+ __u32 attach_bpf_fd;
__u32 attach_type;
__u32 attach_flags;
- __u32 replace_bpf_fd; /* previously attached eBPF
- * program to replace if
- * BPF_F_REPLACE is used
- */
+ __u32 replace_bpf_fd;
+ union {
+ __u32 relative_fd;
+ __u32 relative_id;
+ };
+ __u64 expected_revision;
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command */
@@ -1497,16 +1507,26 @@ union bpf_attr {
} info;
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_QUERY command */
- __u32 target_fd; /* container object to query */
+ union {
+ __u32 target_fd; /* target object to query or ... */
+ __u32 target_ifindex; /* target ifindex */
+ };
__u32 attach_type;
__u32 query_flags;
__u32 attach_flags;
__aligned_u64 prog_ids;
- __u32 prog_cnt;
+ union {
+ __u32 prog_cnt;
+ __u32 count;
+ };
+ __u32 :32;
/* output: per-program attach_flags.
* not allowed to be set during effective query.
*/
__aligned_u64 prog_attach_flags;
+ __aligned_u64 link_ids;
+ __aligned_u64 link_attach_flags;
+ __u64 revision;
} query;
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
index 1d3892168d32..1bea2eb912cd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += hashtab.o arraymap.o percpu_freelist.o bpf_lru_list
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += local_storage.o queue_stack_maps.o ringbuf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += bpf_local_storage.o bpf_task_storage.o
obj-${CONFIG_BPF_LSM} += bpf_inode_storage.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += disasm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += disasm.o mprog.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += trampoline.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += btf.o memalloc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += dispatcher.o
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/mprog.c b/kernel/bpf/mprog.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f6c0b015114f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/mprog.c
@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Isovalent */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_mprog.h>
+
+static int bpf_mprog_link(struct bpf_tuple *tuple,
+ u32 id_or_fd, u32 flags,
+ enum bpf_prog_type type)
+{
+ bool id = flags & BPF_F_ID;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ if (id)
+ link = bpf_link_by_id(id_or_fd);
+ else
+ link = bpf_link_get_from_fd(id_or_fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(link))
+ return PTR_ERR(link);
+ if (type && link->prog->type != type) {
+ bpf_link_put(link);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tuple->link = link;
+ tuple->prog = link->prog;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_prog(struct bpf_tuple *tuple,
+ u32 id_or_fd, u32 flags,
+ enum bpf_prog_type type)
+{
+ bool id = flags & BPF_F_ID;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+
+ if (id)
+ prog = bpf_prog_by_id(id_or_fd);
+ else
+ prog = bpf_prog_get(id_or_fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(prog)) {
+ if (!id_or_fd && !id)
+ return 0;
+ return PTR_ERR(prog);
+ }
+ if (type && prog->type != type) {
+ bpf_prog_put(prog);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tuple->link = NULL;
+ tuple->prog = prog;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_tuple_relative(struct bpf_tuple *tuple,
+ u32 id_or_fd, u32 flags,
+ enum bpf_prog_type type)
+{
+ memset(tuple, 0, sizeof(*tuple));
+ if (flags & BPF_F_LINK)
+ return bpf_mprog_link(tuple, id_or_fd, flags, type);
+ return bpf_mprog_prog(tuple, id_or_fd, flags, type);
+}
+
+static void bpf_mprog_tuple_put(struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ if (tuple->link)
+ bpf_link_put(tuple->link);
+ else if (tuple->prog)
+ bpf_prog_put(tuple->prog);
+}
+
+/* The bpf_mprog_{replace,delete}() operate on exact idx position with the
+ * one exception that for deletion we support delete from front/back. In
+ * case of front idx is -1, in case of back idx is bpf_mprog_total(entry).
+ * Adjustment to first and last entry is trivial. The bpf_mprog_insert()
+ * we have to deal with the following cases:
+ *
+ * idx + before:
+ *
+ * Insert P4 before P3: idx for old array is 1, idx for new array is 2,
+ * hence we adjust target idx for the new array, so that memmove copies
+ * P1 and P2 to the new entry, and we insert P4 into idx 2. Inserting
+ * before P1 would have old idx -1 and new idx 0.
+ *
+ * +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+
+ * |P1|P2|P3| ==> |P1|P2| |P3| ==> |P1|P2|P4|P3|
+ * +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+
+ *
+ * idx + after:
+ *
+ * Insert P4 after P2: idx for old array is 2, idx for new array is 2.
+ * Again, memmove copies P1 and P2 to the new entry, and we insert P4
+ * into idx 2. Inserting after P3 would have both old/new idx at 4 aka
+ * bpf_mprog_total(entry).
+ *
+ * +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+
+ * |P1|P2|P3| ==> |P1|P2| |P3| ==> |P1|P2|P4|P3|
+ * +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+
+ */
+static int bpf_mprog_replace(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_tuple *ntuple, int idx)
+{
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ struct bpf_prog *oprog;
+
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, idx, &fp, &cp);
+ oprog = READ_ONCE(fp->prog);
+ bpf_mprog_write(fp, cp, ntuple);
+ if (!ntuple->link) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cp->link);
+ bpf_prog_put(oprog);
+ }
+ *entry_new = entry;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_insert(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_tuple *ntuple, int idx, u32 flags)
+{
+ int total = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry *peer;
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+
+ peer = bpf_mprog_peer(entry);
+ bpf_mprog_entry_copy(peer, entry);
+ if (idx == total)
+ goto insert;
+ else if (flags & BPF_F_BEFORE)
+ idx += 1;
+ bpf_mprog_entry_grow(peer, idx);
+insert:
+ bpf_mprog_read(peer, idx, &fp, &cp);
+ bpf_mprog_write(fp, cp, ntuple);
+ bpf_mprog_inc(peer);
+ *entry_new = peer;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_delete(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_tuple *dtuple, int idx)
+{
+ int total = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry *peer;
+
+ peer = bpf_mprog_peer(entry);
+ bpf_mprog_entry_copy(peer, entry);
+ if (idx == -1)
+ idx = 0;
+ else if (idx == total)
+ idx = total - 1;
+ bpf_mprog_entry_shrink(peer, idx);
+ bpf_mprog_dec(peer);
+ bpf_mprog_mark_for_release(peer, dtuple);
+ *entry_new = peer;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* In bpf_mprog_pos_*() we evaluate the target position for the BPF
+ * program/link that needs to be replaced, inserted or deleted for
+ * each "rule" independently. If all rules agree on that position
+ * or existing element, then enact replacement, addition or deletion.
+ * If this is not the case, then the request cannot be satisfied and
+ * we bail out with an error.
+ */
+static int bpf_mprog_pos_exact(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < bpf_mprog_total(entry); i++) {
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, i, &fp, &cp);
+ if (tuple->prog == READ_ONCE(fp->prog))
+ return tuple->link == cp->link ? i : -EBUSY;
+ }
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_pos_before(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < bpf_mprog_total(entry); i++) {
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, i, &fp, &cp);
+ if (tuple->prog == READ_ONCE(fp->prog) &&
+ (!tuple->link || tuple->link == cp->link))
+ return i - 1;
+ }
+ return tuple->prog ? -ENOENT : -1;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_pos_after(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple)
+{
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < bpf_mprog_total(entry); i++) {
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, i, &fp, &cp);
+ if (tuple->prog == READ_ONCE(fp->prog) &&
+ (!tuple->link || tuple->link == cp->link))
+ return i + 1;
+ }
+ return tuple->prog ? -ENOENT : bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+}
+
+int bpf_mprog_attach(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog_new, struct bpf_link *link,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog_old,
+ u32 flags, u32 id_or_fd, u64 revision)
+{
+ struct bpf_tuple rtuple, ntuple = {
+ .prog = prog_new,
+ .link = link,
+ }, otuple = {
+ .prog = prog_old,
+ .link = link,
+ };
+ int ret, idx = -ERANGE, tidx;
+
+ if (revision && revision != bpf_mprog_revision(entry))
+ return -ESTALE;
+ if (bpf_mprog_exists(entry, prog_new))
+ return -EEXIST;
+ ret = bpf_mprog_tuple_relative(&rtuple, id_or_fd,
+ flags & ~BPF_F_REPLACE,
+ prog_new->type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ if (flags & BPF_F_REPLACE) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_exact(entry, &otuple);
+ if (tidx < 0) {
+ ret = tidx;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (flags & BPF_F_BEFORE) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_before(entry, &rtuple);
+ if (tidx < -1 || (idx >= -1 && tidx != idx)) {
+ ret = tidx < -1 ? tidx : -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (flags & BPF_F_AFTER) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_after(entry, &rtuple);
+ if (tidx < -1 || (idx >= -1 && tidx != idx)) {
+ ret = tidx < 0 ? tidx : -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (idx < -1) {
+ if (rtuple.prog || flags) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ flags = BPF_F_AFTER;
+ }
+ if (idx >= bpf_mprog_max()) {
+ ret = -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (flags & BPF_F_REPLACE)
+ ret = bpf_mprog_replace(entry, entry_new, &ntuple, idx);
+ else
+ ret = bpf_mprog_insert(entry, entry_new, &ntuple, idx, flags);
+out:
+ bpf_mprog_tuple_put(&rtuple);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int bpf_mprog_fetch(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_tuple *tuple, int idx)
+{
+ int total = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ if (idx == -1)
+ idx = 0;
+ else if (idx == total)
+ idx = total - 1;
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, idx, &fp, &cp);
+ prog = READ_ONCE(fp->prog);
+ link = cp->link;
+ /* The deletion request can either be without filled tuple in which
+ * case it gets populated here based on idx, or with filled tuple
+ * where the only thing we end up doing is the WARN_ON_ONCE() assert.
+ * If we hit a BPF link at the given index, it must not be removed
+ * from opts path.
+ */
+ if (link && !tuple->link)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(tuple->prog && tuple->prog != prog);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(tuple->link && tuple->link != link);
+ tuple->prog = prog;
+ tuple->link = link;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_mprog_detach(struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry **entry_new,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_link *link,
+ u32 flags, u32 id_or_fd, u64 revision)
+{
+ struct bpf_tuple rtuple, dtuple = {
+ .prog = prog,
+ .link = link,
+ };
+ int ret, idx = -ERANGE, tidx;
+
+ if (flags & BPF_F_REPLACE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (revision && revision != bpf_mprog_revision(entry))
+ return -ESTALE;
+ ret = bpf_mprog_tuple_relative(&rtuple, id_or_fd, flags,
+ prog ? prog->type :
+ BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ if (dtuple.prog) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_exact(entry, &dtuple);
+ if (tidx < 0) {
+ ret = tidx;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (flags & BPF_F_BEFORE) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_before(entry, &rtuple);
+ if (tidx < -1 || (idx >= -1 && tidx != idx)) {
+ ret = tidx < -1 ? tidx : -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (flags & BPF_F_AFTER) {
+ tidx = bpf_mprog_pos_after(entry, &rtuple);
+ if (tidx < -1 || (idx >= -1 && tidx != idx)) {
+ ret = tidx < 0 ? tidx : -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = tidx;
+ }
+ if (idx < -1) {
+ if (rtuple.prog || flags) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ idx = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ flags = BPF_F_AFTER;
+ }
+ if (idx >= bpf_mprog_max()) {
+ ret = -ERANGE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = bpf_mprog_fetch(entry, &dtuple, idx);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ ret = bpf_mprog_delete(entry, entry_new, &dtuple, idx);
+out:
+ bpf_mprog_tuple_put(&rtuple);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int bpf_mprog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr,
+ struct bpf_mprog_entry *entry)
+{
+ u32 __user *uprog_flags, *ulink_flags;
+ u32 __user *uprog_id, *ulink_id;
+ struct bpf_mprog_fp *fp;
+ struct bpf_mprog_cp *cp;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ const u32 flags = 0;
+ int i, ret = 0;
+ u32 id, count;
+ u64 revision;
+
+ if (attr->query.query_flags || attr->query.attach_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ revision = bpf_mprog_revision(entry);
+ count = bpf_mprog_total(entry);
+ if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.revision, &revision, sizeof(revision)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.count, &count, sizeof(count)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ uprog_id = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
+ uprog_flags = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_attach_flags);
+ ulink_id = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.link_ids);
+ ulink_flags = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.link_attach_flags);
+ if (attr->query.count == 0 || !uprog_id || !count)
+ return 0;
+ if (attr->query.count < count) {
+ count = attr->query.count;
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < bpf_mprog_max(); i++) {
+ bpf_mprog_read(entry, i, &fp, &cp);
+ prog = READ_ONCE(fp->prog);
+ if (!prog)
+ break;
+ id = prog->aux->id;
+ if (copy_to_user(uprog_id + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (uprog_flags &&
+ copy_to_user(uprog_flags + i, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ id = cp->link ? cp->link->id : 0;
+ if (ulink_id &&
+ copy_to_user(ulink_id + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (ulink_flags &&
+ copy_to_user(ulink_flags + i, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (i + 1 == count)
+ break;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 600d0caebbd8..1c166870cdf3 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1113,7 +1113,12 @@ enum bpf_perf_event_type {
*/
#define BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE (1U << 0)
#define BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI (1U << 1)
+/* Generic attachment flags. */
#define BPF_F_REPLACE (1U << 2)
+#define BPF_F_BEFORE (1U << 3)
+#define BPF_F_AFTER (1U << 4)
+#define BPF_F_ID (1U << 5)
+#define BPF_F_LINK BPF_F_LINK /* 1 << 13 */
/* If BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the
* verifier will perform strict alignment checking as if the kernel
@@ -1444,14 +1449,19 @@ union bpf_attr {
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_ATTACH/DETACH commands */
- __u32 target_fd; /* container object to attach to */
- __u32 attach_bpf_fd; /* eBPF program to attach */
+ union {
+ __u32 target_fd; /* target object to attach to or ... */
+ __u32 target_ifindex; /* target ifindex */
+ };
+ __u32 attach_bpf_fd;
__u32 attach_type;
__u32 attach_flags;
- __u32 replace_bpf_fd; /* previously attached eBPF
- * program to replace if
- * BPF_F_REPLACE is used
- */
+ __u32 replace_bpf_fd;
+ union {
+ __u32 relative_fd;
+ __u32 relative_id;
+ };
+ __u64 expected_revision;
};
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command */
@@ -1497,16 +1507,26 @@ union bpf_attr {
} info;
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_QUERY command */
- __u32 target_fd; /* container object to query */
+ union {
+ __u32 target_fd; /* target object to query or ... */
+ __u32 target_ifindex; /* target ifindex */
+ };
__u32 attach_type;
__u32 query_flags;
__u32 attach_flags;
__aligned_u64 prog_ids;
- __u32 prog_cnt;
+ union {
+ __u32 prog_cnt;
+ __u32 count;
+ };
+ __u32 :32;
/* output: per-program attach_flags.
* not allowed to be set during effective query.
*/
__aligned_u64 prog_attach_flags;
+ __aligned_u64 link_ids;
+ __aligned_u64 link_attach_flags;
+ __u64 revision;
} query;
struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists