netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:44:08 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, olteanv@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for
 88E6390X and 88E6190X

> >Does Marvell give this register a name? If so, please add a #define.
> >Are the bits in the register documented?
> 
> Unfortunately, no. This is one of those undocumented registers. I will
> make a note of it in the commit message.

Undocumented magic is typical for Marvell Erratas.

> 
> >> +     if (!err && up) {
> >> +             if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
> >> +                 chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)
> 
> >6191X? 6193X?
> 
> Errata I have available refers only to 6190x and 6390x. Not sure about other devices.

Please mention this in the commit message.

Thanks
	Andrew