[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230717165724.juh77dr4nmoxoehq@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:57:24 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: add
phy-supply support
On 23-07-17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 18:43, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Document the common phy-supply property to be able to specify a phy
> > regulator.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > index 363b3e3ea3a60..f66d1839cf561 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ properties:
> > can be passive (no SW requirement), and requires that the MAC operate
> > in a different mode than the PHY in order to function.
> >
> > + phy-supply:
> > + description: PHY regulator
> > +
>
> Isn't this property of the PHY? Why would the Ethernet controller play
> with a supply of a phy?
Because this is the current state. Please check the all other MACs
handling the phy-supply (if supported). Some of them handling it under
the mdio-node (not the phy-node) but most bindings do specify this on
MAC level (e.g. FEC, DWMAC (suni, rk)).
I agree that the phy sould handle this but this would be a lot more
effort and since the dwmac-sun8i/rk bindings do support this on MAC
level I would keep it that way.
Regards,
Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists