[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP5jrPFbt7vc77wVi5buYM88gDQ-OCHzm3Hg=EzRxJiha7Ur5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:22:23 -0600
From: Max Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>, Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/10] Introduce ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:19 AM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:
>
> Based on previous RFCs from Maxim Georgiev:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230502043150.17097-1-glipus@gmail.com/
>
> this series attempts to introduce new API for the hardware timestamping
> control path (SIOCGHWTSTAMP and SIOCSHWTSTAMP handling).
>
> I don't have any board with phylib hardware timestamping, so I would
> appreciate testing (especially on lan966x, the most intricate
> conversion). I was, however, able to test netdev level timestamping,
> because I also have some more unsubmitted conversions in progress:
>
> https://github.com/vladimiroltean/linux/commits/ndo-hwtstamp-v7
>
> I hope that the concerns expressed in the comments of previous series
> were addressed, and that Köry Maincent's series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230406173308.401924-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com/
> can make progress in parallel with the conversion of the rest of drivers.
>
> Maxim Georgiev (5):
> net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping
> net: add hwtstamping helpers for stackable net devices
> net: vlan: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() / ndo_hwtstamp_set()
> net: macvlan: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() / ndo_hwtstamp_set()
> net: bonding: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() / ndo_hwtstamp_set()
>
> Vladimir Oltean (5):
> net: fec: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
> net: fec: delete fec_ptp_disable_hwts()
> net: sparx5: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
> net: lan966x: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
> net: remove phy_has_hwtstamp() -> phy_mii_ioctl() decision from
> converted drivers
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 105 ++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h | 6 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 41 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c | 43 ++--
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 61 ++++--
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h | 12 +-
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ptp.c | 34 ++--
> .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h | 9 +-
> .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_netdev.c | 35 +++-
> .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_ptp.c | 24 ++-
> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 34 ++--
> include/linux/net_tstamp.h | 28 +++
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 25 +++
> net/8021q/vlan_dev.c | 27 ++-
> net/core/dev_ioctl.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++-
> 15 files changed, 480 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Vladimir, thank you for taking over and improving this patch stack!
I see you dropped the netdevsim patch:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg901378.html
Do you believe it's not useful any more since the rest of the
patches in the stack were tested through other means?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists