[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230718111621.35a64a0b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:16:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Yunsheng Lin
<yunshenglin0825@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lorenzo Bianconi
<lorenzo@...nel.org>, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, Liang
Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon
Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jesper
Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas
<ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RFC 1/6] page_pool: frag API support for 32-bit arch
with 64-bit DMA
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 20:33:05 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > Only those used in function prototypes. Pointers in structures
> > are somewhat special and don't require fwd declaration.
>
> I gave it a try to split it, and something as below come out:
>
> https://github.com/gestionlin/linux/commit/11ac8c1959f7eda06a7b987903f37212b490b292
>
> As the 'helpers.h' is not really useful when splitting, so only
> 'page_pool_types.h' is added, and include 'page_pool_types.h' in
> 'page_pool.h', does it make sense?
>
> As Alexander is sending a new RFC for the similar problem, I think
> we need to align on which is the better way to solve the problem.
LGTM, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists