[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06b4d3a2-7629-310f-fea5-4c21429dc2f8@tessares.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 10:46:42 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Pedro Tammela
<pctammela@...atatu.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] selftests: tc: increase timeout and add missing
kconfig
Hi David, Jakub, Paolo,
On 13/07/2023 23:16, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> When looking for something else in LKFT reports [1], I noticed that the
> TC selftest ended with a timeout error:
>
> not ok 1 selftests: tc-testing: tdc.sh # TIMEOUT 45 seconds
>
> I also noticed most of the tests were skipped because the "teardown
> stage" did not complete successfully. It was due to missing kconfig.
>
> These patches fix these two errors plus an extra one because this
> selftest reads info from "/proc/net/nf_conntrack". Thank you Pedro for
> having helped me fixing these issues [2].
It looks like this series is marked as "Changes Requested" on Patchwork
[1] but I think that's a mistake. There was one discussion on-going on
the first patch but it looks like the proposed version is OK.
I didn't see any instructions to pw-bot and nothing on the website [2].
Do you prefer if I re-send it?
Cheers,
Matt
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=765455&state=*
[2] https://patchwork.hopto.org/pw-bot.html
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists