[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsJuvXJDcXpo9T19Gw0tDuvyOJdv44Y2bt04MEf1JLxGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:17:51 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Matt Whitlock <kernel@...twhitlock.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...ck.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] splice: Fix corruption of spliced data after
splice() returns
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 17:56, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Splicing data from, say, a file into a pipe currently leaves the source
> pages in the pipe after splice() returns - but this means that those pages
> can be subsequently modified by shared-writable mmap(), write(),
> fallocate(), etc. before they're consumed.
What is this trying to fix? The above behavior is well known, so
it's not likely to be a problem.
Besides, removing spliced pages from the cache is basically guaranteed
to result in a performance regression for any application using
splice.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists