[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230719113836.68859-2-hare@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:38:31 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow
tls_sw_sendmsg() already handles MSG_MORE, but bails
out on MSG_EOR.
Seeing that MSG_EOR is basically the opposite of
MSG_MORE this patch adds handling MSG_EOR by treating
it as the negation of MSG_MORE.
And erroring out if MSG_EOR is specified with MSG_MORE.
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 53f944e6d8ef..9aef45e870a5 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -984,6 +984,9 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
int ret = 0;
int pending;
+ if (!eor && (msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (unlikely(msg->msg_controllen)) {
ret = tls_process_cmsg(sk, msg, &record_type);
if (ret) {
@@ -1193,7 +1196,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
int ret;
if (msg->msg_flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL |
- MSG_CMSG_COMPAT | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES |
+ MSG_CMSG_COMPAT | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_EOR |
MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists