netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] splice: Fix corruption of spliced data after splice() returns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpegvq4M_Go7fHiWVBBkrK6h4ChLqQTd0+EOKbRWZDcVerWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:35:33 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Matt Whitlock <kernel@...twhitlock.name>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...ck.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] splice: Fix corruption of spliced data after
 splice() returns

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 19:59, Matt Whitlock <kernel@...twhitlock.name> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 06:17:51 EDT, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 17:56, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Splicing data from, say, a file into a pipe currently leaves the source
> >> pages in the pipe after splice() returns - but this means that those pages
> >> can be subsequently modified by shared-writable mmap(), write(),
> >> fallocate(), etc. before they're consumed.
> >
> > What is this trying to fix?   The above behavior is well known, so
> > it's not likely to be a problem.
>
> Respectfully, it's not well-known, as it's not documented. If the splice(2)
> man page had mentioned that pages can be mutated after they're already
> ostensibly at rest in the output pipe buffer, then my nightly backups
> wouldn't have been incurring corruption silently for many months.

splice(2):

       Though we talk of copying, actual copies are generally avoided.
The kernel does this by implementing a pipe buffer as a set  of
refer‐
       ence-counted  pointers  to  pages  of kernel memory.  The
kernel creates "copies" of pages in a buffer by creating new pointers
(for the
       output buffer) referring to the pages, and increasing the
reference counts for the pages: only pointers are copied, not the
pages of the
       buffer.

While not explicitly stating that the contents of the pages can change
after being spliced, this can easily be inferred from the above
semantics.

Thanks,
Miklos