[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLkL3eNVNfzZbaBv@shredder>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:26:37 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] IPv6: add extack info for inet6_addr_add/del
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:56:44PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index e5213e598a04..4e0836d90e65 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1027,7 +1027,8 @@ static bool ipv6_chk_same_addr(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static int ipv6_add_addr_hash(struct net_device *dev, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa)
> +static int ipv6_add_addr_hash(struct net_device *dev, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> unsigned int hash = inet6_addr_hash(net, &ifa->addr);
> @@ -1037,7 +1038,7 @@ static int ipv6_add_addr_hash(struct net_device *dev, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa)
>
> /* Ignore adding duplicate addresses on an interface */
> if (ipv6_chk_same_addr(net, &ifa->addr, dev, hash)) {
> - netdev_dbg(dev, "ipv6_add_addr: already assigned\n");
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ipv6_add_addr: already assigned");
How do you trigger it?
# ip link add name dummy10 up type dummy
# ip address add 2001:db8:1::1/64 dev dummy10
# ip address add 2001:db8:1::1/64 dev dummy10
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Better to add extack in inet6_rtm_newaddr():
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL ||
!(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE))
err = -EEXIST;
else
err = inet6_addr_modify(net, ifa, &cfg)
> err = -EEXIST;
> } else {
> hlist_add_head_rcu(&ifa->addr_lst, &net->ipv6.inet6_addr_lst[hash]);
> @@ -1066,15 +1067,19 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct ifa6_config *cfg,
> !(cfg->ifa_flags & IFA_F_MCAUTOJOIN)) ||
> (!(idev->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) &&
> !netif_is_l3_master(idev->dev) &&
> - addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK))
> + addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot assign requested address");
> return ERR_PTR(-EADDRNOTAVAIL);
> + }
>
> if (idev->dead) {
> - err = -ENODEV; /*XXX*/
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device marked as dead");
This seems to be a transient state when IPv6 device is being deleted. See
addrconf_ifdown(). Maybe "IPv6 device is going away".
> + err = -ENODEV;
> goto out;
> }
>
> if (idev->cnf.disable_ipv6) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 is disabled on this device");
> err = -EACCES;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1103,6 +1108,7 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct ifa6_config *cfg,
>
> f6i = addrconf_f6i_alloc(net, idev, cfg->pfx, false, gfp_flags);
> if (IS_ERR(f6i)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Dest allocate failed");
The only thing that can fail in this function is ip6_route_info_create()
which already has an extack argument. Better to pass extack to
addrconf_f6i_alloc() and get a more accurate error message.
> err = PTR_ERR(f6i);
> f6i = NULL;
> goto out;
> @@ -1140,7 +1146,7 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct ifa6_config *cfg,
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> - err = ipv6_add_addr_hash(idev->dev, ifa);
> + err = ipv6_add_addr_hash(idev->dev, ifa, extack);
> if (err < 0) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> goto out;
> @@ -2488,18 +2494,22 @@ static void addrconf_add_mroute(struct net_device *dev)
> ip6_route_add(&cfg, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
> }
>
> -static struct inet6_dev *addrconf_add_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> +static struct inet6_dev *addrconf_add_dev(struct net_device *dev, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct inet6_dev *idev;
>
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> idev = ipv6_find_idev(dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(idev))
> + if (IS_ERR(idev)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No such device");
This is not very accurate. See comment below regarding __in6_dev_get().
> return idev;
> + }
>
> - if (idev->cnf.disable_ipv6)
> + if (idev->cnf.disable_ipv6) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 is disabled on this device");
> return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> + }
>
> /* Add default multicast route */
> if (!(dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) && !netif_is_l3_master(dev))
> @@ -2919,21 +2929,29 @@ static int inet6_addr_add(struct net *net, int ifindex,
>
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> - if (cfg->plen > 128)
> + if (cfg->plen > 128) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 address prefix length larger than 128");
For RTM_NEWROUTE IPv6 code just says "Invalid prefix length", so might
as well be consistent with it. Also, I see IPv4 doesn't have such
messages for its RTM_{NEW,DEL}ADDR messages. If you think it's useful
for IPv6, then I suggest also adding it to IPv4.
Same comment for delete path.
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> /* check the lifetime */
> - if (!cfg->valid_lft || cfg->preferred_lft > cfg->valid_lft)
> + if (!cfg->valid_lft || cfg->preferred_lft > cfg->valid_lft) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 address lifetime invalid");
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - if (cfg->ifa_flags & IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR && cfg->plen != 64)
> + if (cfg->ifa_flags & IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR && cfg->plen != 64) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 address with mngtmpaddr flag must have prefix length 64");
\"mngtmpaddr\"
a prefix length of
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> - if (!dev)
> + if (!dev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unable to find the interface");
This is already checked in the netlink path (see inet6_rtm_newaddr()),
so this message will never be displayed. If you want to see it, then add
it in inet6_rtm_newaddr().
> return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> - idev = addrconf_add_dev(dev);
> + idev = addrconf_add_dev(dev, extack);
> if (IS_ERR(idev))
> return PTR_ERR(idev);
>
> @@ -2941,8 +2959,10 @@ static int inet6_addr_add(struct net *net, int ifindex,
> int ret = ipv6_mc_config(net->ipv6.mc_autojoin_sk,
> true, cfg->pfx, ifindex);
>
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Multicast auto join failed");
> return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> cfg->scope = ipv6_addr_scope(cfg->pfx);
> @@ -2999,22 +3019,29 @@ static int inet6_addr_add(struct net *net, int ifindex,
> }
>
> static int inet6_addr_del(struct net *net, int ifindex, u32 ifa_flags,
> - const struct in6_addr *pfx, unsigned int plen)
> + const struct in6_addr *pfx, unsigned int plen,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
> struct inet6_dev *idev;
> struct net_device *dev;
>
> - if (plen > 128)
> + if (plen > 128) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 address prefix length larger than 128");
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> - if (!dev)
> + if (!dev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unable to find the interface");
> return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
> - if (!idev)
> + if (!idev) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No such address on the device");
A more accurate message would be "IPv6 is disabled on this device". See
ndisc_allow_add().
> return -ENXIO;
> + }
>
> read_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(ifp, &idev->addr_list, if_list) {
> @@ -3037,6 +3064,8 @@ static int inet6_addr_del(struct net *net, int ifindex, u32 ifa_flags,
> }
> }
> read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> +
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IPv6 address not found");
> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> }
>
> @@ -3079,7 +3108,7 @@ int addrconf_del_ifaddr(struct net *net, void __user *arg)
>
> rtnl_lock();
> err = inet6_addr_del(net, ireq.ifr6_ifindex, 0, &ireq.ifr6_addr,
> - ireq.ifr6_prefixlen);
> + ireq.ifr6_prefixlen, NULL);
> rtnl_unlock();
> return err;
> }
> @@ -3378,7 +3407,7 @@ static void addrconf_dev_config(struct net_device *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> - idev = addrconf_add_dev(dev);
> + idev = addrconf_add_dev(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(idev))
> return;
>
> @@ -4692,7 +4721,7 @@ inet6_rtm_deladdr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> ifa_flags &= IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR;
>
> return inet6_addr_del(net, ifm->ifa_index, ifa_flags, pfx,
> - ifm->ifa_prefixlen);
> + ifm->ifa_prefixlen, extack);
> }
>
> static int modify_prefix_route(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp,
> --
> 2.38.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists