lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:44:02 +0200
From: Gioele Barabucci <gioele@...rio.it>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [iproute2 04/22] tc/tc_util: Read class names from provided path,
 /etc/, /usr

On 20/07/23 12:10, Petr Machata wrote:
>> diff --git a/tc/tc_util.c b/tc/tc_util.c
>> index ed9efa70..e6235291 100644
>> --- a/tc/tc_util.c
>> +++ b/tc/tc_util.c
>> @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
>>   
>>   static struct db_names *cls_names;
>>   
>> -#define NAMES_DB "/etc/iproute2/tc_cls"
>> +#define NAMES_DB_USR "/usr/lib/iproute2/tc_cls"
>> +#define NAMES_DB_ETC "/etc/iproute2/tc_cls"
> 
> Is there a reason that these don't use CONF_USR_DIR and CONF_ETC_DIR?
> I thought maybe the caller uses those and this is just a hardcoded
> fallback, but that's not the case.

Thanks for the review Petr.

The reason why I did not use CONF_USR_DIR in these patches is because I 
wanted to minimize the number and amount of changes. But I asked myself 
the same question when I first looked at this and other similar occurrences.

Let me know if I should update the patches to use CONF_{USR,ETC}_DIR.

Regards,

-- 
Gioele Barabucci

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ