[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230721143523.56906-5-hare@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:35:21 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock()
TLS resets the protocol operations, so the read_sock() callback might
be changed, too.
In this case using sock->ops->readsock() in tls_strp_read_copyin() will
enter an infinite recursion if the read_sock() callback is calling
tls_rx_rec_wait() which will call into sock->ops->readsock() via
tls_strp_read_copyin().
But as tls_strp_read_copyin() is supposed to produce data from the
consumed socket and that socket is always a TCP socket we can call
tcp_read_sock() directly without having to deal with callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
---
net/tls/tls_strp.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index f37f4a0fcd3c..ca1e0e198ceb 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ static int tls_strp_copyin(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
static int tls_strp_read_copyin(struct tls_strparser *strp)
{
- struct socket *sock = strp->sk->sk_socket;
read_descriptor_t desc;
desc.arg.data = strp;
@@ -377,7 +376,7 @@ static int tls_strp_read_copyin(struct tls_strparser *strp)
desc.count = 1; /* give more than one skb per call */
/* sk should be locked here, so okay to do read_sock */
- sock->ops->read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, tls_strp_copyin);
+ tcp_read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, tls_strp_copyin);
return desc.error;
}
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists