[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <239ca679597a10b6bc00245c66419f4bdedaff83.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:14:16 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@...il.com>,
dsahern@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
kernel-team@...a.com, yhs@...a.com
Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: fib_tests: Add a test case
for IPv6 garbage collection
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 14:36 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>
> On 7/20/23 02:32, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 11:03 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> > > Add 10 IPv6 routes with expiration time. Wait for a few seconds
> > > to make sure they are removed correctly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...a.com>
> >
> > Same thing as the previous patch.
> >
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> > > index 35d89dfa6f11..55bc6897513a 100755
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ret=0
> > > ksft_skip=4
> > >
> > > # all tests in this script. Can be overridden with -t option
> > > -TESTS="unregister down carrier nexthop suppress ipv6_notify ipv4_notify ipv6_rt ipv4_rt ipv6_addr_metric ipv4_addr_metric ipv6_route_metrics ipv4_route_metrics ipv4_route_v6_gw rp_filter ipv4_del_addr ipv4_mangle ipv6_mangle ipv4_bcast_neigh"
> > > +TESTS="unregister down carrier nexthop suppress ipv6_notify ipv4_notify ipv6_rt ipv4_rt ipv6_addr_metric ipv4_addr_metric ipv6_route_metrics ipv4_route_metrics ipv4_route_v6_gw rp_filter ipv4_del_addr ipv4_mangle ipv6_mangle ipv4_bcast_neigh fib6_gc_test"
> >
> > At this point is likely worthy splitting the above line in multiple
> > ones, something alike:
> >
> > TESTS="unregister down carrier nexthop suppress ipv6_notify \
> > ipv4_notify ipv6_rt ipv4_rt ipv6_addr_metric ipv4_addr_metric
> > \
> > ipv6_route_metrics ipv4_route_metrics ipv4_route_v6_gw \
> > rp_filter ipv4_del_addr ipv4_mangle ipv6_mangle ipv4_bcast_neigh \
> > fib6_gc_test"
> >
> > >
> > > VERBOSE=0
> > > PAUSE_ON_FAIL=no
> > > @@ -747,6 +747,52 @@ fib_notify_test()
> > > cleanup &> /dev/null
> > > }
> > >
> > > +fib6_gc_test()
> > > +{
> > > + setup
> > > +
> > > + echo
> > > + echo "Fib6 garbage collection test"
> > > + set -e
> > > +
> > > + OLD_INTERVAL=$(sysctl -n net.ipv6.route.gc_interval)
> > > + # Check expiration of routes every 3 seconds (GC)
> > > + $NS_EXEC sysctl -wq net.ipv6.route.gc_interval=3
> > > +
> > > + $IP link add dummy_10 type dummy
> > > + $IP link set dev dummy_10 up
> > > + $IP -6 address add 2001:10::1/64 dev dummy_10
> > > +
> > > + for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> > $(seq 0 9)
> >
> > > + # Expire route after 2 seconds
> > > + $IP -6 route add 2001:20::1$i \
> > > + via 2001:10::2 dev dummy_10 expires 2
> > > + done
> > > + N_EXP=$($IP -6 route list |grep expires|wc -l)
> > > + if [ $N_EXP -ne 10 ]; then
> > > + echo "FAIL: expected 10 routes with expires, got $N_EXP"
> > > + ret=1
> > > + else
> > > + sleep 4
> > > + N_EXP_s20=$($IP -6 route list |grep expires|wc -l)
> > > +
> > > + if [ $N_EXP_s20 -ne 0 ]; then
> > > + echo "FAIL: expected 0 routes with expires, got $N_EXP_s20"
> > > + ret=1
> > > + else
> > > + ret=0
> > > + fi
> > > + fi
> >
> > Possibly also worth trying with a few K of permanent routes, and dump
> > the time required in both cases?
>
> I just realized that I don't know how to measure the time required to do
> GC without providing additional APIs or exposing numbers to procfs or
> sysfs. Do you have any idea about this?
Something like this should do the trick
sysctl -wq net.ipv6.route.flush=1
# add routes
#...
# delete expired routes synchronously
sysctl -wq net.ipv6.route.flush=1
Note that the net.ipv6.route.flush handler uses the 'old' flush value.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists