netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] splice: Fix corruption of spliced data after splice() returns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:44:24 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
    Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
    Matt Whitlock <kernel@...twhitlock.name>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
    linux-fsdevel@...ck.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
    linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] splice: Fix corruption of spliced data after splice() returns

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > So what's the API that provides the semantics of _copying_?
> 
> It's called "read()" and "write()".

What about copy_file_range()?  That seems to fall back to splicing if not
directly implemented by the filesystem.  It looks like the manpage for that
needs updating too - or should that actually copy?

David