[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724084820.4aa133cc@hermes.local>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:48:20 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush
fib
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:56:37 +0800
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
> The NetworkManager keeps a cache of the routes. Missing/Wrong events mean that
> the cache becomes inconsistent. The IPv4 will not send src route delete info
> if it's bond to other device. While IPv6 only modify the src route instead of
> delete it, and also no notify. So NetworkManager developers complained and
> hope to have a consistent and clear notification about route modify/delete.
Read FRR they get it right. The routing daemons have to track kernel,
and the semantics have been worked out for years.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists