netdev - Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230724123546.70775e77@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:35:46 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith
 Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:21:52 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> Sagi, I _think_ a stable branch with this should be doable,
> >> would you like one, or no rush?  
> > 
> > I guess a stable branch would not be too bad; I've got another
> > set of patches for the NVMe side, too.
> > Sagi?  
> 
> I don't think there is a real need for this to go to stable, nothing
> is using it. Perhaps the MSG_EOR patches can go to stable in case
> there is some userspace code that wants to rely on it.

I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's
not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull
it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.