netdev - Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:52:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith
 Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 22:44:49 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's
> > not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull
> > it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.  
> 
> Are you aiming this for 6.5 ? We are unlikely to get the nvme bits in
> this round. I also don't think there is a conflict so the nvme bits
> can go in for 6.6 and later the nvme tree will pull the tls updates.

Great, less work :) 

Let's see a v9 with the flushing improved and we'll apply to net-next
directly.