[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724125249.319241b7@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:52:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith
Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 22:44:49 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's
> > not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull
> > it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.
>
> Are you aiming this for 6.5 ? We are unlikely to get the nvme bits in
> this round. I also don't think there is a conflict so the nvme bits
> can go in for 6.6 and later the nvme tree will pull the tls updates.
Great, less work :)
Let's see a v9 with the flushing improved and we'll apply to net-next
directly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists