netdev - Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f37941c-b265-7f28-ebec-76c04804b684@grimberg.me>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:21:52 +0300
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
 linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS


>>> here are some small fixes to get NVMe-over-TLS up and running.
>>> The first set are just minor modifications to have MSG_EOR handled
>>> for TLS, but the second set implements the ->read_sock() callback for 
>>> tls_sw
>>> which I guess could do with some reviews.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>>
>> Sagi, I _think_ a stable branch with this should be doable,
>> would you like one, or no rush?
> 
> I guess a stable branch would not be too bad; I've got another
> set of patches for the NVMe side, too.
> Sagi?

I don't think there is a real need for this to go to stable, nothing
is using it. Perhaps the MSG_EOR patches can go to stable in case
there is some userspace code that wants to rely on it.