netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230725095925.25121-1-ante.knezic@helmholz.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:59:25 +0200
From: Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>
To: <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:56:25 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote
> It looks like you are ignoring the errors reported by
> mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(). Should the above be:
> 
> 		return mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(mpcs);
> 
> instead?
> 

I guess you are right. Would it make sense to do the evaluation for the 
	mv88e639x_sgmii_pcs_control_pwr(mpcs, true);
above as well?