lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724170100.14c6493a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:01:00 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Yinjun Zhang
 <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>, Tianyu Yuan <tianyu.yuan@...igine.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] nfp: add support for multi-pf
 configuration

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:48:09 +0200 Louis Peens wrote:
> This patch series is introducing multiple PFs for multiple ports NIC
> assembled with NFP3800 chip. This is done since the NFP3800 can
> support up to 4 PFs, and is more in-line with the modern expectation
> that each port/netdev is associated with a unique PF.
> 
> For compatibility concern with NFP4000/6000 cards, and older management
> firmware on NFP3800, multiple ports sharing single PF is still supported
> with this change. Whether it's multi-PF setup or single-PF setup is
> determined by management firmware, and driver will notify the
> application firmware of the setup so that both are well handled.

So every PF will have its own devlink instance?
Can you show devlink dev info output?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ