[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724180428.783866cc@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:04:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Enable Designware XGMAC VLAN Stripping Feature 1/2]
dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Add description for rx-vlan-offload
[clean up the CC list]
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 20:32:44 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 18:55 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:21:32 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > That's not how you run it. get_maintainers.pl should be run on patches
> > > or on all files, not just some selection.
> >
> > Adding Joe for visibility (I proposed to print a warning when people
> > do this and IIRC he wasn't on board).
>
> What's the issue here? Other than _how_ the script was used,
> I don't see an actual problem with the script itself.
I just CCed you on another case. If people keep using get_maintainers
wrong, it *is* an issue with the script.
> I use the scripts below to send patch series where a patch series
> are the only files in individual directories.
The fact that most people end up wrapping get_maintainers in another
script is also a pretty strong indication that the user experience is
inadequate.
To be clear - I'm happy to put in the work to make the changes.
It's just that from past experience you seem to have strong opinions
which run counter to maintainers' needs, and I don't really enjoy
writing Perl for the sake of it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists