[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03cc01d9be9c$6e51cad0$4af56070$@trustnetic.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:05:05 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Russell King \(Oracle\)'" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<andrew@...n.ch>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
<mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: pcs: xpcs: adapt Wangxun NICs for SGMII mode
On Monday, July 24, 2023 6:35 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:23:38PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > Wangxun NICs support the connection with SFP to RJ45 module. In this case,
> > PCS need to be configured in SGMII mode.
> >
> > Accroding to chapter 6.11.1 "SGMII Auto-Negitiation" of DesignWare Cores
> > Ethernet PCS (version 3.20a) and custom design manual, do the following
> > configuration when the interface mode is SGMII.
> >
> > 1. program VR_MII_AN_CTRL bit(3) [TX_CONFIG] = 1b (PHY side SGMII)
> > 2. program VR_MII_AN_CTRL bit(8) [MII_CTRL] = 1b (8-bit MII)
> > 3. program VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1 bit(0) [PHY_MODE_CTRL] = 1b
>
> I'm confused by "PHY side SGMII" - what does this mean for the
> transmitted 16-bit configuration word? Does it mean that _this_ side
> is acting as if it were a PHY?
I'm not sure, because the datasheet doesn't explicitly describe it. In this
case, the PHY is integrated in the SFP to RJ45 module. From my point of
view, TX control occurs on the PHY side. So program it as PHY side SGMII.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists