[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46d4b5d2-55ca-0af3-bb02-7d49d9d2d4fa@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:32:31 +0200
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
CC: <Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <jic23@...nel.org>, <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
<arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>, <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<will@...nel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <arnd@...nel.org>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] bus: rifsc: introduce RIFSC firewall controller
driver
On 7/26/23 12:26, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:41:00PM +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c
>
> ...
>
>> +static int stm32_rif_acquire_semaphore(struct stm32_firewall_controller *stm32_firewall_controller,
>> + int id)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *addr = stm32_firewall_controller->mmio + RIFSC_RISC_PER0_SEMCR + 0x8 * id;
>> +
>> + __set_bit(SEMCR_MUTEX, addr);
>
> Hi Gatien,
>
> Sparse seem a bit unhappy about this.
>
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: expected unsigned long volatile *addr
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: got void [noderef] __iomem *addr
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: expected unsigned long volatile *addr
> .../stm32_rifsc.c:83:9: got void [noderef] __iomem *addr
>
> But it's not immediately apparent to me what a good solution is.
>
Hi Simon,
This is indeed incorrect, set_bit is used to modify bit fields, not
writing to a register. I'll change to writel, as in
stm32_rif_release_semaphore(). Thank you for pointing this out.
Best regards,
Gatien
>> +
>> + /* Check that CID1 has the semaphore */
>> + if (stm32_rifsc_is_semaphore_available(addr) ||
>> + FIELD_GET(RIFSC_RISC_SCID_MASK, readl(addr)) != RIF_CID1)
>> + return -EACCES;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists